Administration of the Municipal Formation Tikhoretsk District. Administration of the Municipal Formation Tikhoretsk District Entrepreneurship Council

RESOLUTION

HEADS OF MUNICIPAL EDUCATION LENINGRAD DISTRICT

dated 16.01.2009, No. 28

village Leningradskaya

About the Council on entrepreneurship of the municipality

Leningradsky district

In order to implement public policy in the field of support and development of small business in the municipality of the Leningradsky district, in accordance with the Federal Law of July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in Russian Federation", The Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated April 04, 2008 No. 1448-KZ" On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Krasnodar Territory ", in accordance with Article 23 of the Charter of the municipal formation, it was stated:

1. To approve the composition of the Entrepreneurship Council of the municipal formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 1).

2. To approve the Regulation on the Council for Entrepreneurship of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 2).

3. The decree of the head of the Leningradsky district of February 7, 2003 No. 89 "On the Council for Entrepreneurship in the Leningradsky District" shall be considered invalid.

4. Control over the implementation of this resolution shall be entrusted to the first deputy head of the municipal formation V.G. Prokopets.

5. This resolution comes into force from the date of its signing and is subject to publication in the newspaper "Steppe Zori" and posting on the official website of the administration of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the Internet.

Head of the Municipal Formation

Leningradskiy district S.V. Garkusha

APPENDIX

to the resolution of the administration
municipality
Leningradsky district
dated 07.06.2019 No. 452

"APPENDIX No. 1

APPROVED BY
by decree of the head
municipality
Leningradsky district
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28

COMPOUND

Entrepreneurship Council of the municipality
Leningradsky district

Gordienko Fedor Nikolaevich	Acting Head of the Municipal Formation, Chairman of the Council;
Sheredekin Alexander Nikolaevich	Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Deputy Chairman of the Council;
Mishnyakov Vladimir Ivanovich	Acting Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Head of Department Agriculture and Food Administration;
Troyanovskaya Tatiana Vasilievna	Head of Department economic development, consumer services and information technologies municipal administration, Secretary of the Council;
Alexander A.	Head Architecture and Urban municipal administration;
Sherstobitov Vitaly Nikolaevich	Head of the Department of Consumer Market and Services Administration of the municipality;
Rita G.	Head of the Department of Property Relations of the municipal administration;
Aleksey Aleksandrovich	Director of "Lenkompleksinvest" (by agreement);
Vladimir Alexandrovich	Head of farm "Teply Stan" (by agreement);
Patrakov Vladimir Vladimirovich	Director of "Precepts of Ilyich" (by agreement);
Eremenko Nikita A.	Director of "Ermak" (by agreement);
Pavlograd Igor V.
Karpenkov Edward V.	Individual entrepreneur, The head of KFH (by agreement);
Sergei Nikolaevich	Individual entrepreneur (in agreement);
Sexton Olga Alexandrovna	Individual entrepreneur (as agreed).
Salangin Artem O.	Individual person (advisor);
Ponomarev Igor Nikolaevich	General manager LLC "Leningrad loaf" (by agreement);
Alexander Alexandrovich	Founder of company "Junker" (by agreement);
Drobahin Sergey V.	Director of "Energy Center" (by agreement).

Acting

head of municipal formation

Leningrad region FN Gordienko

ANNEX 2 №
APPROVED BY
decree of the head
municipality
Leningrad area
from 16.01.2009 № 28

POSITION

on the Council for Entrepreneurship of the municipality

Leningradsky district

1. General Provisions

1.1. These Regulations are developed in accordance with the Constitution of Russian Federation, Federal Law of July 24, 2007 № 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium enterprises in the Russian Federation", the Law of the Krasnodar Territory on April 4, 2008 № 1448-KZ "About development of small and medium-sized business in Krasnodar territory " regulations Council of municipalities of the Leningrad region and the head of the municipal formation of Leningrad region.

1.2. The Entrepreneurship Council of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (hereinafter referred to as the Council) is a permanent advisory body formed to ensure practical interaction of local governments and the population of the Leningradsky District municipality engaged in entrepreneurial activities, to consolidate their interests to develop proposals on the main directions of entrepreneurship development in the territory municipal formation and participation in the implementation of the economic policy of the municipal formation.

1.3. The Council in its work is guided by the current legislation of the Russian Federation and this Regulation.

2. The main tasks of the Council

2.1. Preparation of proposals on the following issues:

A) the formation of new approaches to the development of entrepreneurship in the municipality of the Leningradsky District, their reflection in the municipal target program for the development and support of small business;

B) improving interaction public associations entrepreneurs and business entities with local self-government bodies of the municipality of Leningradsky District on the basis of transparency;

C) improving the regulatory legal framework local government bodies that regulate entrepreneurial activity in the municipality of the Leningradsky District, including in the financial and credit, tax, property and investment spheres, as well as the elimination of administrative barriers to the development of entrepreneurship;

D) expanding opportunities to improve the educational level of entrepreneurs;

E) creating conditions for the economic interest of business entities, attracting entrepreneurs and financial resources to solve social and economic problems that are urgent for the municipality of Leningradsky District.

2.2. Contributing to the formation of a positive public opinion about entrepreneurial activity and structures that support the development of entrepreneurship in the territory of the municipality, through the dissemination of the positive experience of business entities and relevant organizations.

2.3. Involvement of business entities in the development and implementation of state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development;

2.4. Promotion and support of initiatives aimed at implementing state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development in the municipality of Leningradsky District;

2.5. Conducting a public examination of drafts of regulatory legal acts of local self-government bodies of the Leningradsky District, regulating the development of entrepreneurship;

2.6. Attraction of citizens, public associations and representatives of funds mass media to the discussion of issues related to the implementation of the right of citizens to entrepreneurial activity, and the development of recommendations on these issues.

3. Council rights

3.1. To carry out the tasks assigned to it, the Council performs the following functions:

1) Makes decisions on issues considered at a meeting of the Council.

2) Develops and submits proposals for improving the regulatory legal acts of the municipality of Leningradsky District on the elimination of administrative barriers that impede the development of entrepreneurship.

3) Involves, in the established manner, in the work of the Council, representatives of the sectoral (functional) bodies of the administration of the municipal formation Leningradsky District, heads public organizations, small businesses, entrepreneurs without the formation of a legal entity.

4) Hears at its meetings the relevant officials on issues within the competence of the Council.

5) Asks the authorities state power, other organizations and officials information on issues within the competence of the Council.
6) Interact with state authorities on issues within the competence of the Council.

7) Takes part in the development and implementation of the municipal target program"On the development of small business entities of the municipal formation Leningradskiy district".

8) Submits proposals to normative legal acts in the form of projects on issues requiring a decision by the head of the municipality or the Council of the municipality.

9) Considers the issues of participation of business entities in district and settlement activities, determines the boundaries of this participation.
10) Submits proposals for the provision of financial and property support to business entities in priority areas of development.
11) Considers materials on violation current legislation Of the Russian Federation in the sphere of the functioning of the consumer market and in terms of protecting consumer rights in the territory of the municipality of Leningradsky District.

12) Considers appeals and proposals of legal and individuals on the implementation of business activity in the territory of the municipal formation of Leningrad region.

13) consider appeals on overcoming administrative barriers to the development of entrepreneurship, the facts of unjustified inspections, prepares proposals on pre-trial settlement any disputes and disagreements.

14) Provides control over the execution of decisions taken by the Board.

4. Composition of the Board

4.1. The Council is formed of representatives of the municipality administration, heads of enterprises and organizations, reputable business.

4.2. The composition of the Board is approved by the head of the municipality.

4.3. The Chairman and members of the Board in the Council working on a voluntary basis.

5. Organization of the work of the Council

5.1. The main form of work of the Council - meeting. Meetings are held Chairman of the Board, and in his absence the chairman substituent.

5.2. The Council is working on a permanent basis. Scheduled meeting of the Board shall be convened as necessary, but at least once a quarter.

Extraordinary meetings of the Council shall be convened by the Chairman of the Board, and in his absence - Deputy Chairman. The grounds for unscheduled meetings are well-reasoned proposal of the Board with a list of suggested questions for discussion, and the date of convocation.

5.3. Board members participate in its work personally. Council meeting has a quorum if it is attended by more than half of its members, including the Chairman of the Board or the Deputy Chairman.

5.4. Council decisions are taken by a simple majority vote of its members. V some cases Council decisions can be taken by poll. Decisions and recommendations on topical issues of entrepreneurship Council, the Council's decision, communicated to the municipal administration of the Leningrad region, the Council of the municipality, Leningrad region, financial management Department of Finance, Budget and Control of Krasnodar region in Leningrad region, industry (functional) administrations of the municipal formation of Leningrad region and organizations belonging decisions taken.

5.5. Meetings of the Council and the decisions reflected in the minutes of the meeting. The protocol signed by the Chairman and Secretary of the Board.

5.6. The duty to prepare and conduct meetings of the Council, as well as the monitoring of the implementation of its decisions are assigned to the Secretary of the Board.

5.7. Chairman of the board:
1) manages the work of the Council;
2) holds meetings of the Council;
3) approves the work plans of the Council and reports on their implementation;
4) signs minutes and other documents adopted by the Council;
5) coordinates the activities of the working groups created by the Council.
5.8. Secretary of the Council:
1) prepares documents for consideration at a meeting of the Council;
2) informs the members of the Council on the issues of the activities of the Council;
3) keeps records of all documents, applications and other materials submitted to the Council for consideration.
5.9. Council members:
1) participate in the meetings of the Council;
2) make proposals to the work plan of the Council, as well as on issues within the competence of the Council;
3) prepare conclusions on draft decisions of the Council;
4) make proposals for convening extraordinary meetings of the Council.
5.10. Control over the activities of the Council is exercised by the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District.
5.11. The termination of the Council's activities is carried out by decision of the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District.

First Deputy Head
municipal formation V.G. Prokopets

The council was formed in May 1990 in accordance with a tripartite agreement between the Moscow City Council, the Moscow City Executive Committee and the Moscow Union of Cooperatives.

The Council is a body of expert, informational and advisory support for the activities of the Mayor and the Moscow Government in the field of small and medium-sized business development.

The Council includes heads of various public associations, unions, associations of small and medium-sized businesses, support structures, scientists, reputable entrepreneurs, as well as advisers to the prefects of the administrative districts of Moscow on small and medium-sized businesses.

Objectives of the council: improving state policy in relation to small business in Moscow, researching and generalizing the problems of small businesses, protecting legal rights and lobbying for the interests of small businesses in the authorities of Moscow, improving the regulatory framework for small businesses, attracting entrepreneurs to solving the most important socio-economic problems of the city ...

The main activities of the Council:

• Organizes interaction with industry, professional and territorial associations, unions and associations of small and medium-sized businesses, other business structures.
• Performs constant interaction with authorized by the government of Moscow executive authority of Moscow, responsible for the support and development of small and medium-sized businesses in Moscow, to develop agreed solutions and improvement of the state policy in the field of small and medium-sized businesses.
• Cooperates with departments, the committee Mie prefectures of administrative districts of Moscow and other bodies of executive power of Moscow on the development and support of small and medium-sized businesses.
• Involves representatives of business community and entrepreneurs in the preparation of decisions of the executive authorities of Moscow, in the development of measures to provide organizational, financial, logistical and other assistance to small and medium-sized businesses, associations, unions, associations, other non-profit organizations and structures to support small and medium-sized businesses.
• It provides training and public examination of draft legal acts of Moscow, affecting the interests of small and medium-sized businesses.
• Takes part in the process of drafting and implementation of federal, municipal, territorial and sectoral programs of development and support of small and medium-sized businesses.
• Participates in the development of other city programs aimed at addressing urgent social and economic problems of the city of Moscow, bringing to their implementation of small and medium-sized enterprises of Moscow, their associations, unions and associations.
• Offers expertise in the field of small and medium business projects and programs, and encourages them to implement.
• Participates in the work of the executive authorities of Moscow authorities to provide material support to small and medium business and organizations forming the infrastructure of support of small and medium-sized businesses, carried out in the form of transfer of possession and (or) use of state property owned by the city of Moscow, in the including land, Buildings and structures, non-residential buildings, equipment, machinery, tools, plants, Vehicle, Equipment, tools, on a reimbursable basis, free of charge or on preferential terms.
• It summarizes the opinions of entrepreneurs on topical issues of doing business and brings to the executive authorities of the city of Moscow the consolidated position of the business community on these issues.

To carry out its activities, the council:

Engages experts and consultants from among scientists, reputable entrepreneurs, representatives of government bodies and other specialists to work on the council;

Forms temporary and permanent creative teams, commissions, expert and working groups;

Requests and receives, in accordance with the established procedure, from departments, committees, prefectures of administrative districts of the city of Moscow, administrations of districts of the city of Moscow and other executive bodies of the city of Moscow, the necessary information, analytical, reference and statistical materials, as well as legal acts;

Interacts with public expert councils on small and medium-sized businesses at the prefectures of the administrative districts of the city of Moscow.

© President of Tatarstan at the Council on Entrepreneurship 06:00 / 16 Jan 2018

A serious discussion broke out around the expediency of holding a council on entrepreneurship in Tatarstan. Opponents note that there are more officials than businessmen in the hall, while opponents deny this.

The main discussion about the Council on Entrepreneurship unfolded the day before on the Telegram channel "Failure". The authors noted that there were more officials than businessmen in the front ranks and even marked them with red dots.

Business Ombudsman Assessment Timur Nagumanov differs from the data in the photograph. In his department, more than 280 entrepreneurs were counted, including only about a hundred different officials.

"Red button for business"

The team of the Russian business ombudsman was the first to present its development Boris Titov, who is running for President of Russia. Human rights defender Alexander Khuruji told about new system"Nabat", which is designed as mobile app for business. The developers decided to make Tatarstan the testing region. Thanks to the application, any entrepreneur will be able to press the "red" button, Titov's team will have to provide assistance to the business within 24 hours. First of all, this button solves the problem of sudden unscheduled inspections of companies that supervisory authorities are used to sinning.

In 2015, Khuruji himself ended up in jail because of a seemingly economic dispute between his company and the largest grid company in the Southern Federal District, IDGC of the South. The latter lost in the Arbitration Court the case against JSC "Energia" Khuruji and was forced to pay 500 million rubles. But, as is often the case in Russia, instead of settling the dispute peacefully, she decided to transfer the case to a criminal plane. Khuruji was accused of stealing those same 500 million rubles.

Then Titov personally stood up for the businessman. Therefore, for an entrepreneur from Rostov who has gone through fire, water and copper pipes, the issue of inspections and abuse by supervisory authorities is not only a good attempt to systematize work in Russia as a whole, but also a personal story.

The fact that such cases also appear periodically in Tatarstan is no secret to anyone. Now entrepreneurs will have a "red button", how effective it will be, time will tell.

Environmental problems from the lips of large and not so big players in the solid waste market

This time there was a lot of talk about the waste management reform. In the near future, a regoperator should appear in Tatarstan, as well as in other regions. There will most likely be two of them in the republic. They will be responsible for garbage collection throughout Tatarstan. Most likely they will be RT-Invest and Mekhuborka.

On the eve of the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship, the director of "RT-Invest" Sergey Bogatov... According to him, from January 1, 2016 for a negative impact on environment the fee should not be paid by entrepreneurs, as it was before, but by the landfills themselves and regional operators. Due to the fact that there is still no regoperator in Tatarstan, the payment for the negative impact fell entirely on the waste management companies, in fact, on landfills. The total cost of payment for a year in the republic is about 264 million rubles, which is one third of the total revenue of landfills.

Operators were able to roll over the abolition of fees for the negative impact on the transition period 2016-2017, it was assumed that during this time the MSW market reform would take place, but it stalled. In 2018, companies come with incomprehensible working conditions. Bogatov proposed to support the amnesty for 2018 and to advocate the differentiated rate, which the Ministry of Construction of Russia proposes to introduce.

The head of the state committee of the republic on tariffs answered Bogatov Marat Zaripov... He said that for 2018 the tariff for negative impact on the environment was not introduced, but it will be adopted as soon as the issue of the regoperator is resolved. Then this payment will fall on the shoulders of ordinary citizens. Minnikhanov asked where the head of the Ministry of Construction of Tatarstan, who is responsible for the choice of the regoperator, is. The official replied that the competition will be held in March 2018, and that the reform will be completed by the end of the year.

To change the situation with the payment of companies for 2018, the help of the State Duma deputies was needed to raise the problem at the federal level. There was a parliamentarian in the hall Fatih Sibagatullin who promised to settle everything.

Also director of the Povolzhskaya Ecological Company Olga Gudimova complained about the long registration of a license for waste management. Operators are required to obtain a license based on the federal waste classification catalog, but it is constantly changing, because of this, the procedure stretches to 200 days. It turned out that the problem had been resolved, so no instructions were given for this case.

We also talked about the absurdity in environmental reporting. It turned out that every year entrepreneurs must submit three reports to Rosprirodnadzor. The entrepreneurs proposed to combine the report and submit it at a convenient time for organizations.

Minnikhanov hinted that no one reads such a heap of papers in the department anyway, so it makes sense "to do some right things for the country."

Entrepreneurs from the housing and communal services sector complained about careless tenants

They asked for protection from the President of Tatarstan and from ... residents apartment buildings, which inundated management companies with complaints. General Director of LLC "Brior + Kausaria" Kausaria Matrosova told how citizens seriously spoil the life of management companies.

According to her, instead of appealing to the Criminal Code, residents are used to scribbling their complaints directly to the State Housing Inspectorate, although many issues can be resolved without involving a government agency. According to Matrosova, it gets to the point of absurdity - citizens demand to replace the light bulb through the State Housing Inspectorate.

The sphere of housing and communal services is rather closed for residents. Often, residents are simply denied complaints in a boorish manner and offered to call other phones. Despite the fact that the owner of an apartment building has an agreement only with the Criminal Code, residents are often asked to contact third-party phones. For example, in order to replace the notorious light bulb in the entrance, in Chelny you need to call Zhilenergoservice, with which not a single apartment owner has a contract.

And communal services must fulfill their duties themselves - it should be light in the entrances, regardless of whether there are complaints from tenants or not, and the State Housing Inspectorate allows you to set up any management company in a working way. Perhaps, it is precisely because of the effectiveness of work with the government agency that more and more residents of the republic are turning to it, which naturally cannot be liked by public utilities.

Nevertheless, Matrosova offered a way out of the situation, which could suit the tenants. She believes that complaints can first go to management company, and not immediately to the supervisory authorities. There is a positive experience in this direction. We would suggest that the State Housing Inspectorate should consolidate control over the execution of complaints, which, if it is not executed, will come and fine the company.

One-stop shop principle for excursions for children

The entrepreneurs also talked about the bureaucracy in coordinating tourist trips for children. General Director of the "Tourist Information Center of Kazan" Natalia Abramovich said that after the well-known accidents, the procedure for coordinating children's travel has become too bureaucratic. According to her, in order to organize a trip, it is necessary to pass the approval of as many as five departments. As a result, the transportation of children on excursions has been sharply reduced. In Chelny, children have practically ceased to be taken on excursions, a drop of 95%, in Kazan at 40%.

Abramovich proposed to create a mechanism when it will be possible to coordinate a children's trip according to the principle of one window. According to the businessman, such proposals are already in the government of the republic for approval and are awaiting the president's signature. Minnikhanov asked where the document got stuck.

The head of the Tatarstan State Committee for Tourism, Sergei Ivanov, replied that the document "is clearing up spelling errors." As a result, they promised to accept the document allowing the approval of children's tourist trips in five days, and not in a month, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.

The certificate of conformity is valid today, but not tomorrow

businessman

The Federal Accreditation Agency wakes up and decides to revoke the accreditation issued from the laboratory and cancel all issued protocols. The manufacturer does not know about this and is not trained to read the thoughts of the Federal Accreditation Agency. But the inspection authorities are informed about this, which unscheduled appear on the doorstep of the manufacturer and inform him of the disappointing news that he is a violator and must pay a fine and go through the whole procedure again. And, perhaps, soon again to be punished. And so on ad infinitum. There is one scapegoat in this tale. The one who needs the most is the manufacturer.

One of the most pressing problems for manufacturers was raised by an entrepreneur from Naberezhnye Chelny. Everyone knows that in Russia, in order to be able to sell their products, the manufacturer must receive a declaration of conformity with the requirements of the technical regulations of the Customs Union.

The negotiation mechanism is quite complex in itself. A businessman must apply to the Federal Accreditation Agency, get a list of accredited laboratories, hand over products and Required documents, pay for laboratory services, receive a test report for their products, the manufacturer himself sends the protocol to the certification body, which finally issues a declaration. It seems that everyone is happy, but not for long, notes Akulchev.

The entrepreneur lamented that there is no responsibility of the state body for the revocation of a license from a particular laboratory, therefore only the entrepreneur suffers from this, who, in fact, did not violate anything.

According to the entrepreneur, Rosakkreditatsiya unilaterally issues and revokes accreditations, and the certification body does not always check test reports. To break the vicious circle, it is necessary to distribute and consolidate responsibility at the legislative level.

President of Tatarstan

I believe that the entrepreneur, probably, should have somehow checked ... But, nevertheless, if the laboratory did not have the relevant documents, then it was not entirely correct to fine. It was necessary to give an opportunity, to warn, to say that the certificate is not valid. In general, this should not happen. If this laboratory has the appropriate documents, it should be held accountable, as well as the body that certified it. I am ready to appeal to the Russian government, to the State Duma

A discussion about the advisability of an entrepreneurship council started on the Telegram channel

Serious discussion unfolded in the Telegram-channel "Neudascha". Unknown authors compared the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of Tatarstan with the Japanese kabuki theater.

Telegram channel "Failure"

The seventh expanded meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of the Republic of Tatarstan has already taken place. Same - beautiful picture, beautiful costumes, ritual and carefully calibrated performance. Like in Japanese kabuki theater. All roles are regulated - there is Tachiyaku - a wise, dexterous, powerful, attractive protagonist. The entire scenario is built around this character. There are also negative personalities - various Katakiyaku, bureaucratic officials, with whom they are trying to fight. Some are fought in absentia, and some are present in the hall. Each session, like in kabuki theater, is divided into acts that can be watched as a separate performance. An important place in it is occupied by the stage, which in a classical theater stands right in the middle of the hall. Each act is ritually unchanged - first the narrator (who is also the moderator) gives the floor to one of the specially trained noble men or the shogun, and he, entering the stage, begins his sad narration, which is accompanied in the kabuki theater by mournful music, and in our case, also video sequence: Somewhere again in housing and communal services ordinary people are oppressed And this injustice obscures my views of Fuji After finishing the story, he leaves and all attention switches to the wise Tachiyaka. As befits a hero, Tachiyaku immediately delves into the problem and immediately delivers a verdict. At the same time, various Katakiyaku guilty of the problem are called on the stage, who, by tradition, mutter something guilty in their defense. But Tatiyaka cannot be fooled - an instruction to the negligent should be urgently corrected. Mournful music sounds again and then the transition to another act follows ... No need to say - a very original and folklore performance! This is only in Tatarstan and Japan. But, besides the therapeutic and aesthetic effect, there must be something else! First, on the TV picture, only Katatiyaku officials are present near Tachiyaku. But where, in fact, are the commoners-entrepreneurs? Why do they huddle at the back of the stage - even though the show is dedicated to them? Secondly, where are the reports on the results of past performances? After all, they have been going on for two years - a lot of issues must be resolved. Moreover, this council met for the first time this year - the year of the Yellow Earth Dog, so just curiosity tears - and what was done last year of the Red Fire Rooster? But we believe that such meetings are still not a dogma, not an action once and for all frozen in the ritual framework, but a living organism that can change. Unlike the centuries-old kabuki theater.

The criticism voiced on the Telegram channel was answered in the office of the business ombudsman. According to the body, the meeting was attended by 276 entrepreneurs and 109 officials. The vast majority of entrepreneurs present are active participants project teams advice. Those who, over the past three months, have proposed options for solving systemic business problems, have worked out options together with the authorities in the framework of meetings of project groups. The draft decisions, which are voiced by entrepreneurs at the council, are really well prepared. Businessmen, experts and government representatives have been working for months on the council's platform to present high-quality, detailed, effective solutions.

Nagumanov was accused of voicing prepared questions from pre-instructed businessmen at council meetings.

In the office of the business ombudsman, they answer that in order to prepare for the seventh meeting and develop decisions, entrepreneurs held more than 60 such meetings and conferences in the council, at each of which a decision was worked out. Most of the meetings were held in the "Headquarters" - on an open and convenient platform for communication between business and government, to which every entrepreneur has access. All entrepreneurs participating in the council meeting are representatives of small businesses. During the previous council meetings, speakers were: farmers and shopkeepers in villages, owners of small cafes, private kindergartens and medical clinics.