Kornienko's jailers plundered state-owned houses. Anatoly Rudy: “There are no big and small enemies, there are just enemies.” video from the Federal Penitentiary Service Shields and body armor

Petr Sarukhanov / Novaya Gazeta

In this case, we are not talking about ordinary employees, but about “managers and assistants (advisers) of the highest group of positions.” That is, apartments motivate bosses.

Take, for example, the Bailiff Service, which is subject to housing privileges according to the decree. All senior management of the FSSP of the Russian Federation have already provided themselves with housing, as it is written in the resolution, “by decision of the head of the federal government body,” that is, in this case, by order of the director of the FSSP, the chief bailiff of Russia, Artur Parfenchikov.

For example, Parfenchikov’s deputies, Tatyana Ignatieva, Sergei Sazanov and Vladimir Voronin, have already received housing subsidies. They did not report the subsidies they received as income in their declarations. Moreover, these deputy directors of the FSSP already had apartments, and not small ones - more than a hundred meters.

But it wasn’t enough for them, they wanted more. And of course, these citizens purchased new homes exclusively in the center of Moscow.

Well, besides, these living spaces were bought not at the market price, but at the municipal price, since they belonged to the city of Moscow. That is, both a subsidy and a price discount.


Tatiana Ignatieva. Photo: RIA Novosti

The apartment Ignatieva bought with budget money became too small for her after a couple of years. Well, really, it’s somehow not respectable to live alone with your husband in an apartment measuring only 55.6 square meters. m. Despite the fact that Ignatieva received subsidies twice in 2010 for the purchase of this apartment.


Declaration for 2010

This directly contradicts Article 53 (additional state guarantees for civil servants) of the Federal Law “On the Civil Service of the Russian Federation” and the Rules for providing federal civil servants with a one-time subsidy for the purchase of residential premises, which states that federal civil servants are provided with a one-time subsidy for the purchase of residential premises “ 1 (one) time for the entire period of state civil service in the Russian Federation.” In Parfenchikov’s order, the second subsidy for Ignatieva was called very simply - “increase in subsidies above the established standard”.


Declaration for 2014

However, already in 2014, Ignatieva indicated in her income statement an amount many times higher than her average annual income - 15154355.52 rubles. The deputy director of the FSSP does not disclose the source of this money, but Ignatieva’s new living space is also listed in the same declaration - 109.2 square meters. m, that is, twice the size of the previous apartment.


Ignatieva’s new housing is located in an elite business class complex on the street. Kastanaevskaya, 18, despite the fact that the place of registration of Ignatieva’s permanent residence remains her apartment in Petrozavodsk on the street. Stantsionnoy, 23. So where does civil servant Ignatieva get the money for another new luxury apartment in Moscow? Could this be a third subsidy from the state?


Moscow, st. Kastanaevskaya, 18. Photo: Victoria Odissonova / Novaya Gazeta

In 2011, the chief bailiff, Parfenchikov, resolved his own housing issue - he wrote out a subsidy for housing in Moscow.

In his income declaration, Parfenchikov kept silent about the millions received from the state.

Four-room apartment measuring 159.3 square meters. m, which was acquired by Arthur Parfenchikov, is located in an elite new building on the street. Kompozitorskaya, 17, in the Arbat area. But the chief bailiff already had a “monastery” of 218.8 square meters. m, and his wife, now the deputy chairman of the Supreme Court of Karelia, has another “nest” of 69.1 square meters. m. But these shelters are in Petrozavodsk, and Parfenchikov has been in Moscow since 2007. Where should a government official live?



Declaration of income of the head of the FSSP for 2012
Kompozitorskaya street, house 17. Photo: Victoria Odissonova / Novaya Gazeta SMS from the chief bailiff to one of his colleagues

“But I actually lived in a hostel for six years and still live there,” Parfenchikov complained to one of his close associates in February 2013 about the lack of understanding of ordinary subordinates, “without a family, my son has grown up virtually without a father. And for six years I did not give myself the right to a subsidy. Well, okay, I perceive everything in my life as good, so I have to endure it.” Moreover, it should be noted that Parfenchikov complained at a time when renovation work was already underway in his new apartment in the center of Moscow.

What the chief police officer of Russia considers a “dormitory” is a separate building in the Ershovo holiday home, located in the former count’s estate of the Olsufievs near Zvenigorod.

In addition to separate apartments, Artur Olegovich had the opportunity to swim in the pool, do fitness, play billiards and even shoot at the Voinushka paintball club in the holiday home.


Ershovo Estate
The house in which the chief bailiff Artur Parfenchikov lived. Ershovo. Photo: Elena Masyuk / Novaya Gazeta

Back in Ershovo, the director of the FSSP of Russia, Artur Parfenchikov, organized seminars and meetings with deputy heads of territorial bodies of the FSSP of Russia and heads of anti-corruption units. Chief bailiff Parfenchikov systematically awarded the director of the Ershovo rest home with certificates and medals... And then suddenly the health resort, which for the director of the FSSP had already become, one might say, a home, Parfenchikov called a “hostel”...

Arthur Parfenchikov. Photo: RIA Novosti

By the way, in the context of Parfenchikov’s personal housing history, his reaction to the recent bill of the Ministry of Justice, which allows debtors to be deprived of their only home to repay the loan, is very interesting. According to the chief bailiff, “the proposed bill when foreclosure provides for a guarantee for housing, but within the established standards.”

Well, now about the main thing - how did the subsidies received by their leaders from the state affect the work of the FSSP? After all, the government decree clearly states that subsidies to management personnel are provided to “increase the motivation for the effective performance of their official duties.”

Here are dry statistics from the official reports of the FSSP on the predicted and actually completed execution of enforcement proceedings (by year):


Judging by the figures, since 2009, the quality of work of bailiffs has been steadily declining from year to year. If in 2009 the number of actually completed productions was 76.8%, then in 2015 it was only 38.6%. That is, the performance of bailiffs during this period decreased by more than half. Then for what kind of “efficiency” do the senior leaders of the FSSP give themselves subsidies for apartments?

Enforcement proceedings have not been carried out for many years. I know this from myself. For almost seven years, the bailiffs have not wanted to enforce a court decision in a civil case in which I am the plaintiff and the defendant is the former chairman of the Federal Securities Commission, Igor Kostikov. Bailiffs repeatedly illegally terminated proceedings without complying with the court decision. The court, in turn, has repeatedly ruled on the illegality of bailiffs' decisions to end legal proceedings. But the bailiffs still have not implemented the court’s decision.

The prosecutor's office has repeatedly revealed cases of loss of writs of execution by bailiffs and widespread cases of falsification of documents for the illegal termination of enforcement proceedings. “How can you lose a writ of execution? Judges are subject to disciplinary action for similar violations,” said the deputy chairman of the Moscow City Court, Galina Agafonova, indignantly, noting the low performance of the bailiffs.

What is the director of the FSSP, the chief bailiff of Russia, Artur Parfenchikov, doing in the conditions of the constantly deteriorating efficiency of bailiffs? If you carefully study the FSSP website, you will find out that the main job of the chief police officer of Russia, Parfenchikov, is to travel around the country and present the FSSP banner to regional services.

In October 2105, President Putin entrusted such a banner to Parfenchikov. The chief bailiff has been pushing for the issuance of a specialized banner to the department for many years. And so, having received the secret, Parfenchikov now hands over territorial banners to the heads of the bailiffs.

29 regions of Russia, including the Magadan region, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug and Kamchatka, have already received their banners from the hands of the director of the FSSP. And how many more regions, republics and territories are ahead!

In addition to the banners, the chief bailiff delegates to his subordinates the images of the Holy Great Martyr Theodore Stratilates, whom Patriarch Kirill (Gundyaev) designated to the bailiffs as a heavenly patron in 2010. So there is someone to hope for.

Komorka for the FSIN officer

In April 2013, another Russian government decree was issued on privileges for civil servants, this time signed by Prime Minister Medvedev. This is Resolution No. 369 “On the provision of a one-time social payment for the purchase and construction of residential premises to employees of institutions and bodies of the penal system, the federal fire service of the State Fire Service, authorities for control of the circulation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and customs authorities of the Russian Federation.” This document, as well as the government decree of 2009, states that “employees holding senior management positions in the central offices of federal executive bodies,” that is, bosses, can be given apartments, even if they do not need them .

According to Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 3, 2016 No. 519 “On some issues of the Federal Penitentiary Service,” there are now 26 such senior positions in the central office of the FSIN. Of these, 11 personnel have already received their millions for housing. This is military lieutenant general, first deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Anatoly Rudy; military lieutenant general, deputy director Valery Boyarinev; Military Major General, Deputy Director Valery Maksimenko; military major general, chief of administrative affairs Irina Vetrova; military colonel, deputy director Alexander Sapozhnikov; military major general, head of the security and escort department Alexander Khabarov and a number of other senior officials of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation.

Anatoly Rudy. Photo: RIA Novosti

For example, at the time of his arrival at the Penitentiary Service, First Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation Anatoly Rudoy already had two apartments: 63.3 and 38.8 square meters. m. But in 2013, by order of the director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, he received a housing subsidy in the amount of 16,154,028 rubles. As it is written in, he made “entrance and share contributions to participate in the invested construction of a residential building in order to obtain residential premises in the form of a separate apartment using funds from a one-time social payment for the acquisition or construction of residential premises.” That is, Rudy did not buy ready-made housing, but invested in it at the construction stage. Of course, it's more profitable. It is logical to assume that Rudoy at that time did not have an urgent question of where to live, otherwise he would have acquired a ready-made roof over his head as quickly as possible.


When in 2014, the public and journalists had questions about the allocation of million-dollar subsidies for apartments to the FSIN generals, the deputy director of the FSIN and at the same time the head of the housing commission Oleg Korshunov (by the way, judging by the declaration, Korshunov is the owner of a whole fleet of motor vehicles: Mercedes Benz, Cadillac Escalade ", a Harley Davidson motorcycle, a Carver boat, a Yamaha scooter, a Brig motor boat) regarding the money for Rudy said: “Well, this is not entirely normal when the first deputy director of the department, Anatoly Rudy, who lives in Balashikha , stands in traffic jams for five hours, instead of working for the benefit of all FSIN employees during this time. And how else, if not with housing, can you motivate the necessary employees?”

So, Anatoly Rudy received a subsidy from the state budget in 2013, but became the owner of an apartment measuring 75.9 square meters. m on Michurinsky Prospekt, 26, in a secure business class complex only on September 27, 2016, that is, three years later. But what about the traffic jams that Rudoy’s colleague Oleg Korshunov was so worried about?


Michurinsky, 26. Photo: Victoria Odissonova / Novaya Gazeta

Well, in addition, we discovered that General Rudy in 2012 violated the requirements of the legislation on the civil service of the Russian Federation and anti-corruption by reporting false information about his income and property. Rudy did not indicate that he sold a plot of land and a residential building in the Moscow region, in the Balashikha district, in the village of Rusavkino-Romanovo, the Vyunka development area. For concealing this information, General Rudoy should at least be subject to disciplinary punishment.

Multimillion-dollar subsidies for apartments were received not only by the generals of the central office of the FSIN, but also by the heads of regional departments. For example, Colonel Anatoly Tikhomirov, during his leadership of the Federal Penitentiary Service in Moscow in 2012, received 27,757,420 rubles from the state budget. At the exchange rate at that time, this is approximately one million US dollars. Although at that time Colonel Tikhomirov already had an apartment measuring 74 square meters. m. Ownership of an apartment measuring 122.4 sq. m. m in a new guarded luxury complex on the street. Profsoyuznaya, 91, Tikhomirov registered only in February 2014.


Extract from the cadastre, Balashikha
Profsoyuznaya, 91. Photo: Victoria Odissonova / Novaya Gazeta

Why do high-ranking officials of the Federal Penitentiary Service receive multimillion-dollar subsidies for apartments? After all, according to the Prime Minister’s decree, money is given to senior officials of the Federal Penitentiary Service who do not need apartments for a reason, but “in order to take into account the characteristics of the professional and official activities of employees and to increase motivation for the effective performance of their official duties.” But there are big questions about the effectiveness of the FSIN.

For example, on the website of the Federal Penitentiary Service in the chapter “Information on the achieved results” it says: “The conditions of detention in the pre-trial detention center generally comply with the requirements of Article 23 of the Federal Law of July 15, 1995 No. 103-FZ “On the detention of suspects and accused of committing crimes.” The average size of sanitary area per person corresponds to the norm established by the legislation of the Russian Federation and is 4.3 square meters. m".

Alas, everything is not like that. Those in Moscow pre-trial detention centers have been in overcrowded cells for many years, sometimes the overcrowding there reaches 100%. Prisoners are forced to sleep in turns, they do not have their own sleeping places, cots are almost always broken, and even if there are, there is nowhere to put them, all the space is occupied by bunks. Prisoners in the capital's detention centers weave hammocks from sheets between the second tiers of beds. From the height of these wicker beds, prisoners fall to the floor and are injured... But according to the reports of the Federal Penitentiary Service, everything turns out to be normal, each prisoner has 4.3 square meters. m.

“In 2015, the FSIN budget exceeded 300 billion rubles. This means that with a total “prison population” of 650 thousand people, budget expenditures per prisoner amount to almost half a million rubles per year. The growth compared to 2003 is simply fantastic - almost 10 times, says the report of the Institute of Problems of Modern Society. “Under such conditions, one would expect that the situation with the maintenance, food, and medical care of prisoners should improve dramatically. However, in reality this did not happen. The fact is that the bulk of the FSIN budget goes not to prisoners, but to department employees. Direct personnel costs alone take up almost 70% of the FSIN budget. And taking into account the costs of providing housing for employees, as well as other government procurement, the total costs for employees reach 75-80% of the FSIN budget.”

In terms of expenditures from the federal budget, the FSIN ranks sixth among all ministries and departments. At the same time, the Penitentiary Service has systematically allowed itself to overspend over the last four years. This began from the time when Gennady Kornienko headed the service. At the same time, Vladimir Sedykh, adviser to the director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, recently stated that if the budget of the penal system is further reduced, this will lead to a shortage of food for prisoners in colonies. In other words, the Federal Penitentiary Service will continue to spend budget money on providing its high-ranking employees with apartments, but prisoners will not have to be fed?

By the way, Kornienko himself never provided a subsidy for his apartment. As it was when he joined the FSIN, he had two apartments measuring 77.8 and 94.2 square meters. Mm, they remain that way. Which, of course, cannot but command respect.

But he could have given himself a subsidy, as the chief bailiff Parfenchikov did.

The director of the FSIN turned out to have another interest: he travels. If the director of the FSSP is now increasingly busy presenting banners to regional departments, then the main FSIN officer is traveling around the world - Cuba, Poland, Mexico, Norway, Finland, South Korea, Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Belgium, Australia, USA, China... And that’s all not just like that, but to study the world experience of the penitentiary system. True, it is not clear where this best practice is being implemented.


Gennady Kornienko. Photo: FSIN

Corruption, torture, failure to provide medical care (mortality in Russian prisons is 1.5 times higher than in Europe), meager salaries for prisoners for work in correctional colonies (three to four thousand rubles a month), disgusting conditions of detention for prisoners, which has sharply increased in recent years a decrease in the release of prisoners on parole - all this is the current reality of the penal system.

Anatoly Tikhomirov. Photo: FSIN

For example, for what merits did the former head of the Federal Penitentiary Service for Moscow, and now the head of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Moscow Region, Anatoly Tikhomirov, receive one million dollars? It was during his time as the head of the Moscow department that corruption and extortion flourished for many years in the Moscow pre-trial detention center-4 “Bear”. The criminals and some of the prison staff were one organized criminal group. Now, on the facts of crimes committed within the walls of pre-trial detention center-4, a criminal case has been opened, which is being investigated by the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Moscow. Novaya Gazeta has repeatedly talked about what is happening in pre-trial detention center-4. It is difficult to imagine that the head of the Moscow department, Tikhomirov, did not know about the lawlessness in the Medved pre-trial detention center. However, instead of being held accountable for crimes committed by his subordinates, Tikhomirov received a multimillion-dollar subsidy for an apartment and was transferred to a similar position in the region.


Declaration for 2013

So, what is the practice of apartment privileges for senior ranks? Issuing multimillion-dollar subsidies for apartments for a certain social group—civil servants—violates the constitutional rights of other Russian citizens. After all, Article 19 of the country’s highest normative legal act, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, states that “the state guarantees equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen, regardless of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, property and official status...”. As a result of the above government decisions, the positions of government officials give them unjustified advantages in the right to receive material benefits from the state free of charge and improve their own living conditions.

P.S.

Novaya Gazeta has sent official inquiries to Artur Parfenchikov and Gennady Kornienko and is ready to return to the topic when answers are received.

OFFICIAL NOTICE:

First Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Anatoly Anatolyevich Rudy, Lieutenant General of the Internal Service. Born on May 30, 1967 in Balashikha, Moscow Region. After graduating from the Gorky Higher Anti-Aircraft Missile Command School of Air Defense in 1988, he served in the Armed Forces until 1994. From February 1994 to October 2012, he served in various positions in the State Courier Service of the Russian Federation, including more than ten years as head of the security and weapons department, head of the personnel and special support department, head of the planning and organization of official activities department. In 2003 he graduated from the Russian Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation. He was awarded the special rank of Lieutenant General of the Internal Service by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 12, 2013 No. 907. By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated March 10, 2014 No. 132 he was appointed to the position of First Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service. He was awarded the state award of the Russian Federation - the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree.

KORSHUNOV OLEG ADOLFOVICH



OFFICIAL NOTICE:

Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Oleg Adolfovich Korshunov, born on April 4, 1963 in Moscow. In 1985 he graduated from the Moscow Financial Institute (Credit and Economics Faculty) with a degree in finance and credit. From 1988 to 1989 he served in the army. Worked as deputy manager of the Medvedkovsky branch of the USSR Housing and Social Bank; Deputy Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Board of a commercial bank; Head of the Department of Economic Development and Trade of the Ryazan Region. In 2012 he graduated from the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation. Since 2013 - Head of the Financial and Economic Department of the Federal Penitentiary Service. By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated March 10, 2014 No. 132, he was appointed to the position of Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service. By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 14, 2014 No. 662, he was awarded the class rank of Active State Advisor

SAPOZHNIKOV ALEXANDER YAKOVLEVICH



OFFICIAL NOTICE:

Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Sapozhnikov Alexander Yakovlevich - Major General of the Internal Service. Born on May 24, 1960 in the city of Stry, Ukrainian SSR, Lvov region. After graduating from the Volsky Higher Military Order of the Red Star School of Logistics named after the Lenin Komsomol in 1981, he served in a group of Soviet troops in Germany until 1986, then until 1989 in the Far Eastern Military District. In 1992 he graduated from the Military Academy of Logistics and Transport of the Order of Lenin. From 1996 to 2006 - head of the food service of the Leningrad Military District. In 2009 he graduated from the Northwestern Academy of Public Service. From 2007 to 2012 - Deputy Head of the Office of the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. He was awarded a state award - the Order of Military Merit. By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of January 14, 2013 No. 24, he was appointed to the position of Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service.

TSATUROV VLADISLAV VLADIMIROVICH



OFFICIAL NOTICE:

Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsaturov, Lieutenant General of the Internal Service. Born on January 22, 1960 in the city of Shemakha, Azerbaijan SSR. He graduated from the Omsk Higher Police School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR in 1990, and from the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in 1994. Served in the Armed Forces from 1979 to 1981. In 1983, he entered service in pre-trial detention center No. 1 of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Irkutsk Regional Executive Committee. In 1986, after graduating from the Barnaul Special Secondary School for training command staff of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, he served in various positions in the pre-trial detention centers of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Altai Regional Executive Committee. From September 1993 to June 2004, he served in senior positions in the SIDiSR, the Penitentiary Penitentiary of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Altai Territory, and the Penitentiary Penitentiary of the Ministry of Justice of Russia for the Moscow Region. From June 2004 to August 2007, he served in the internal affairs bodies as deputy head of the department of the Main Directorate of Criminal Investigation of the Criminal Police Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, deputy head of the department of the Directorate for Analysis and Development of Strategic Decisions in the Fight against Crime (“A”) of the Criminal Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Russia. Since August 2007, he has been serving in the penal system. In December 2009, he was appointed to the position of head of the department for organizing the activities of prisons and pre-trial detention centers of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. In August 2010, he was appointed to the position of Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN of Russia). Awarded the Zhukov Medal, the Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree, and departmental awards

COLLEGE OF THE FSIN OF RUSSIA
COMPOUND

Kornienko Gennady Aleksandrovich - Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service (Chairman of the Board); Zhuikov Dmitry Sergeevich - Head of the Office of the President of the Russian Federation for ensuring the constitutional rights of citizens; Smirnov Alexander Alexandrovich - First Deputy Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation, Actual State Councilor of Justice of the Russian Federation, 1st class; Rudy Anatoly Anatolyevich - First Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Lieutenant General of the Internal Service; Korshunov Oleg Adolfovich - Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service; Loshchinin Alexander Mikhailovich - Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service - Head of the Department of Pre-trial Detention Facilities of Central Subordination; Sapozhnikov Alexander Yakovlevich - Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Major General of the Internal Service; Tsaturov Vladislav Vladimirovich - Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Lieutenant General of the Internal Service; Tatarskikh Oleg Feliksovich - head of the internal security department of the Federal Penitentiary Service; Shaeshnikov Vladimir Konstantinovich - Head of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Lieutenant General of the Internal Service; Mishchenkov Petr Grigorievich - Chairman of the Council of the All-Russian Public Organization of Veterans of the Federal Penitentiary Service. Secretary of the board: Vera Valerievna Inozemtseva tel.: 495 -983-90-21

STRUCTURAL DIVISIONS OF THE FSIN OF RUSSIA

DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE G.A. Kornienko OWN SECURITY DEPARTMENT O.F. Tatarskikh BUSINESS MANAGEMENT I.V. Vetrova FIRST DEPUTY DIRECTOR A.A. Rudy DEPUTY DIRECTOR VRIP Gnezdilov A.V. DEPUTY DIRECTOR O.A. Korshunov DEPUTY DIRECTOR Head of the Department of Detention Centers of Central Subordination A.M. Loshchinin DEPUTY DIRECTOR A.YA. Sapozhnikov DEPUTY DIRECTOR V.V. Tsaturov DEPUTY DIRECTOR, VRIP V.G. Boyarinev OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT E.V. Gnedov DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ORGANIZATIONAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT N.A. Skopintsev HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT M.Yu.Vinokurov DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL, SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WORK WITH CONVICTED A.A. Novikov DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL AND INFORMATION SUPPORT, COMMUNICATIONS AND ARMAMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION OF EXECUTION OF PUNISHMENTS NOT RELATED TO ISOLATION OF CONVICTED FROM SOCIETY E.L. Zarembinskaya LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF ACTING L.L. Klimakov DEPARTMENT OF CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION, REAL ESTATE, REPAIR OPERATION DEPARTMENT OF ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION ACTIVITY AND LABOR ADAPTATION OF CONVICTED CONVICTS V.A. Maksimenko FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT A.L. Kochukov DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY ISOLATORS OF CENTRAL SUBMISSION DEPARTMENT OF LOGISTICS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SUPPORT ORGANIZATION S.V. Sparrow REGIME AND SUPERVISION DEPARTMENT V.V. Fedorov DEPARTMENT OF SECURITY AND ESCORT A.V. Khabarov DEPARTMENT OF ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES OF PRISONS AND TREATMENT FACILITIES DEPARTMENT OF EXECUTION OF SENTENCES AND SPECIAL ACCOUNTING S.A. Esipov DIVISIONS DIRECTLY SUBJECT TO THE FSIN OF RUSSIA MAIN CENTER FOR ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE CENTER FOR STATE PROPERTY AND HOUSING AND HOUSING SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE SERVICE PUNISHMENT CENTER FOR SUPPORTING EDUCATIONAL WORK OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE DEPARTMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE ACTIVITIES OF OPERATIONAL DIVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL EXECUTION SERVICE PUNISHMENT MANAGEMENT OF MOTOR TRANSPORT OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE JOINT EDITION OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE CENTRAL REGULATIVE AND TECHNICAL LABORATORY OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE CENTRAL MATERIAL BASE -TECHNICAL AND MILITARY SUPPLIES OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT No. 101 OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE PRESENTATION FACILITIES OF THE CENTRAL SUBMISSION EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE MAIN CLINICAL CENTER FOR MEDICAL AND SOCIAL REHABILITATION OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE SANATORIUMS OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE MAIN CENTER OF THE STATE SHOCK SANITARY AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SUPERVISION OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE MEDICAL AND SANITARY UNITS OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE RECREATION BASE "VOLNA" OF THE FEDERAL PENALTY SERVICE TERRITORIAL BODIES OF THE FSIN OF RUSSIA MAIN DEPARTMENTS FOR THE ENTITIES OF THE RF DEPARTMENTS FOR THE ENTITIES OF THE RF DEPARTMENTS FOR THE ENTITIES OF THE RF INSTITUTIONS DIRECTLY SUBORDINATE TO THE TERRITORIAL BODIES OF THE FSIN OF RUSSIA ESCORT UNITS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTERS INTERREGIONAL COMMUNICATION CENTERS SECURITY DEPARTMENTS OF PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS (HOSPITALS) OF A SPECIALTY TYPE WITH INTENSIVE SUPERVISION CENTRAL BASES MTIVS TRAINING CENTERS CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENTS HOUSING AND COMMUNAL DEPARTMENTS INTERREGIONAL REPAIR AND RESTORATION BASES PSYCHOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CUSTOM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LABORATORIES CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS, INVESTIGATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ISOLATORS AND CRIMINAL INSPECTIONS CORRECTIONAL COLONIES EDUCATIONAL COLONIES PRISONS PRISONS CRIMINAL INSPECTIONS


LINKS

Website of the President of Russia Website of the President of Russia http://www.kremlin.ru Website of the Government of the Russian Federation Website of the Government of the Russian Federation http://www.government.ru Website of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation Website of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation http://www.minjust.ru Website of the State Duma Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Website of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation http://www.duma.gov.ru Federal portal of management personnel Federal portal of management personnel http://rezerv.gov.ru/ Federal Agency for the supply of weapons, military, special equipment and materiel, Rosoboronpostavka, official website of Rosoboronpostavka, supply of weapons, placement of orders Federal Agency for the supply of weapons, military, special equipment and materiel, Rosoboronpostavka, official website of Rosoboronpostavka, supply of weapons, placement of orders http://rosoboronpostavka.ru/ Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation http://www.fsb.ru/ Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation http://www.fso.gov.ru/ Federal Migration Service Federal Migration Service http://www.fms. gov.ru/ Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation http://www.sledcom.ru/ EMERCOM of Russia EMERCOM of Russia http://www.mchs.gov.ru/ Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation http://www. mil.ru/ Website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation http://www.mvd.ru/ru/ General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation http://www.genproc.gov.ru/ Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Supreme Court of the Russian Federation http://www.vsrf.ru/index.php 112.RU - Law enforcement portal of the Russian Federation 112.RU - Law enforcement portal of the Russian Federation http://www.112.ru/ Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation http://www.ombudsmanrf.ru/ Commissioner under the President of the Russian Federation for children's rights Commissioner under the President of the Russian Federation for children's rights http://www.rfdeti.ru/ Federal Bailiff Service Federal Bailiff Service http:/ /www.fssprus.ru/ Official microblog "Twitter" http://twitter.com/#!/FSIN_Russia Video blog of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia on YouTube Video blog of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/fsinvideo Video blog of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia on RuTube Video blog of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia on RuTube http://fsin-video.rutube.ru/users/4309559/ Video date Video date http://videosvidanie.com International film and television festival "DetectiveFEST" International film and television festival "DetectiveFEST" http://www.detectivefest. ru/ Online store of pre-trial detention centers located in the city. Moscow Online store of pre-trial detention centers located in Moscow http://sizomag.ru/ Forum about life in prison Forum about life in prison http://forumtyurem.net/ Shalom to you, Prisoner! Shalom to you, Prisoner! http://shalom-zk.ru/ Big Government http://bigovernment.ru/ Spetsnaz.org - community of Russian special forces veterans Spetsnaz.org - community of Russian special forces veterans http://www.spec-naz.org/ Russia Anti-terror Russia Anti-terror http://www.antiterror.ru/ Interpolitex Interpolitex http://www.interpolitex.ru/ Legal services Legal services http://vashurist.info/ Legal portal Legal portal http://www.jur-portal. ru/ Guarantor Guarantor http://www.garant.ru/ Legal system Referent Legal system Referent http://www.referent.ru/ Constitution of the Russian Federation Constitution of the Russian Federation http://www.constitution.ru/ Code Code http: //www.kodeks.ru/ Internet and Law Internet and Law http://www.internet-law.ru/ All codes http://dallakian.narod.ru/kodeks/kodeks.htm Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://vipe.fsin.su/ Voronezh Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Voronezh Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://vi.fsin.su/ Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://pi.fsin.su/ Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://ki.fsin.su/ Pskov Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Pskov Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://pui.fsin.su/ Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://sui. fsin.su/ Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://www.vui.fsin.su/ Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia http://www.apu.fsin.su/ Council under the President of the Russian Federation on development of civil society and human rights http://www.president-sovet.ru Institute of Human Rights Institute of Human Rights http://www.hrights.ru/ Moscow Helsinki Group Moscow Helsinki Group http://www.mhg.ru/ Peoples Russia Peoples of Russia http://www.narodru.ru/ IMO "Against Corruption" IMO "Against Corruption" http://www.anticorr.ru/ Support of Russia Support of Russia http://www.opora.ru/ Human rights in Russia Human rights in Russia http://www.hro.org/ Central trade union website Central trade union website http://www.trud.org/ Russian Youth Union Russian Youth Union http://www.ruy.ru/ IAC “Sova” » IAC “Sova” http://www.sova-center.ru/ Euro-Asian Jewish Congress Euro-Asian Jewish Congress http://eajc.org/ru/ DEMOS DEMOS http://www.demos-center.ru/ Association “Voice” » Association "Voice" http://www.golos.org/ Center for Interethnic Cooperation Center for Interethnic Cooperation http://www.interethnic.org/ EAWARN - Network of Ethnological Monitoring and Early Warning of Conflicts EAWARN - Network of Ethnological Monitoring and Early Warning of Conflicts http ://eawarn.ru/ Committee for Civil Rights Committee for Civil Rights http://zagr.org/ MOO "Spravedlivost" MOO "Spravedlivost" http://www.s-pravdoy.ru/ Public Chamber of the Russian Federation Public Chamber of the Russian Federation Federation http://www.oprf.ru/ Public control Public control http://www.onk-ru.info/ OOD "For Human Rights" OOD "For Human Rights" http://zaprava.ru/ General Director® - personal magazine of the manager http://gd.ru/ Construction Newspaper Construction Newspaper http://www.stroygaz.ru/ MOSPRESS MOSPRESS http://www.mos-ps.ru/ SMI.ru SMI.ru http:// www.smi.ru/ Scandals.ru Scandals.ru http://skandaly.ru/ Rosbalt Rosbalt http://www.rosbalt.ru/ RIA Novosti RIA Novosti http://www.rian.ru/ RIA Novy Region » RIA "New Region" http://www.nr2.ru/ RosBusinessConsulting RosBusinessConsulting http://www.rbc.ru/ Parlcomm Parlcomm http://www.parlcom.ru/ NTA - Volga region NTA - Volga region http:// www.nta-nn.ru/ Infox.ru Infox.ru http://www.infox.ru/ IA "REGNUM" IA "REGNUM" http://www.regnum.ru/ All Russia All Russia http:// www.allrussia.ru/ MediaText. RU MediaText.RU http://www.mediatext.ru/ Mandat.ru Mandat.ru http://www.mandat.ru/ Kompromat.Ru Kompromat.Ru http://www.compromat.ru/ ITAR-TASS ITAR -TASS http://www.itar-tass.com/ Interfax Interfax http://www.interfax.ru/ DNI.RU DNI.RU http://www.dni.ru/

It is difficult to say whether the heads of the Federal Department of Corrections are familiar with the principle of Pareto distribution (also known as the 20 to 80 principle), in which, for example, 20 percent of working people do 80 percent of the useful work (and vice versa), or 20% of capital is lost in the pockets of 80% of the population, leaving them to enjoy only a fifth of material wealth. About the usefulness of the work of this structure, tainted by many years of leadership Alexandra Reimer, there is nothing laudatory to say. But in the distribution of housing subsidies, the department’s employees not only achieved the Italian sociologist’s indicators, but also significantly improved them: a third of the corresponding funding for the prison department went to only nine high-ranking officers. By the way, the system of taking away housing from colleagues turned out to be copied from practices of the Ministry of Defense the times of Serdyukov.

The Accounts Chamber and the Office of the President of the Russian Federation for the fight against corruption are checking the legality of receipt the highest general of the prison department free housing subsidies.

The FSIN says that they are not afraid of any inspections, because in their department, according to the deputy director and head of the housing commission Oleg Korshunov , « the most transparent distribution system of all law enforcement agencies and there are no violations."

Last year, the Accounts Chamber already conducted an audit of the financial and economic activities of the Federal Penitentiary Service and identified massive violations of budget and other legislation; the figures were announced as shocking - 3.8 billion rubles were recognized as ineffective expenses, says State Duma deputy Anton Ishchenko. - However government money and further spent as they please: subsidies to generals amount to 13 million, 15 million rubles and 16 million rubles - and all this to the detriment of ordinary employees who cannot wait for housing or compensation for its purchase for years and complain about the opacity of queues in many instances, including queue for an appointment with deputies.

At the same time, according to Ishchenko, those who received multimillion-dollar housing loans were already doing well.

Judging by the declarations, the income of these officers exceeds 2 million rubles a year - by all standards this is a very decent salary, in fact the level of a minister,” notes Ishchenko. - And they themselves, unlike ordinary employees, can buy their own housing, and not receive it at the expense of the state.

The news that money came from the federal budget for one-time social payments for the purchase or construction of housing spread before the New Year.

This was not officially reported, but the accounting department had a crush of people waiting to receive apartments for 10–15 years, say sources in the Federal Penitentiary Service. - Everyone was shaking papers, almost fighting with each other, because it was said that there would be a separate queue to receive gratuitous subsidies. Then a special commission was created, which was supposed to consider appeals from officers. And people stood there for days too.

But, according to an informed interlocutor, no one saw the generals in these lines. There was only a rumor that some of the deputy directors of the service, who had their own housing, suddenly found themselves homeless. And then, when the declarations were made public, the rumor turned out to be true.

For example, according to the income statement for 2012, the deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Anatoly Rudy earned 1.6 million rubles, his wife 1.1 million rubles. They also listed two apartments: did Rudoy own them? shares with an area of ​​63 sq. m, also an apartment in use with an area of ​​38.8 sq. m. m and a garage. In addition to similar shares in two apartments, the wife also owned a Toyota RAV-4.

In his income information for 2013, Anatoly Rudy indicated that he earned 19.5 million rubles, taking into account a one-time social payment for the purchase or construction of residential premises in the amount of 16.3 million rubles. Anatoly Rudy came to the FSIN in October 2012; before that, he, together with the current director Gennady Kornienko, worked in the State Courier Service.

Another deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Alexander Sapozhnikov, indicated in his 2012 declaration that he owns a land plot of 1.6 thousand square meters. m, house - 314 sq. m, ? in shared ownership of an apartment with an area of ​​79 sq. m, as well as housing in use 61 sq. m. In 2013, according to income information, Sapozhnikov also received a payment as needing housing in the amount of 16.1 million rubles. General Sapozhnikov arrived in Moscow from St. Petersburg, he is also Gennady Kornienko’s creation; before his transfer to the Federal Penitentiary Service in 2012, he was deputy head of the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region.

The head of the operational department of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Evgeny Gnedov, arrived in Moscow from Novosibirsk. In 2012, he owned a land plot with an area of ​​570 square meters. m, apartment 63 sq. m, also listed behind it was a dorm room. Gnedov’s wife was jointly owned by an apartment with an area of ​​63 square meters. m, a dorm room is in use. In 2013, according to income information, Gnedov received a one-time payment from the state in the amount of 21.3 million rubles.

Deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service and head of the housing commission Oleg Korshunov said in his interview that there are no violations when allocating these loans there are no.

The director of the department, by law, has the right to issue such subsidies out of turn to high-ranking employees, starting with the heads of the department, explains Korshunov. - Well, it’s not entirely normal when the 1st Deputy Director of the department, Alexander Rudy, who lives in Balashikha, stands in traffic jams for five hours, instead of working for the benefit of all FSIN employees during this time. And how else, if not with housing, can you motivate the necessary employees?

The income statement of the head of the department for organizing the activities of prisons and pre-trial detention centers, Valery Boyarinev, underwent interesting metamorphoses over the year. In his income information for 2012, he indicated that he owned a land plot of 1 thousand square meters. m, land plot 583 sq. m, residential building 367 sq. m, cottage and apartment in use 69 sq. m. In the information on income for 2013, Boyarinev owned only a dacha and a land plot of 583 square meters. m, and the residential building “passed” into use. Also disappeared from Land Rover's declaration. But a subsidy of 22 million rubles appeared.

The head of the security and escort department of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Alexander Khabarov, indicated in his income statement for 2012 that he has an apartment of 49 square meters. m, and his wife owns an apartment with an area of ​​63 square meters. m. According to the information for 2013, the wife turned out to be homeless, and Khabarov received 19.5 million rubles.

The head of the department for the execution of sentences and special accounting of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Sergei Esipov, according to the declaration for 2012, had a room in a dormitory of 44 square meters. m, as well as an apartment of 40 sq. m. In addition to this housing, the wife had another apartment - 74 sq. m. m. In 2013, Esipov received a subsidy of 23.8 million rubles.

The head of the Federal Public Institution Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Andrei Bykov, owned an apartment of 44 square meters in 2012. m and a land plot of 500 sq. m. According to income information, the area of ​​the apartment decreased to 39 square meters. m, but there was a one-time payment in the amount of 13.6 million rubles.

According to the declaration for 2012, the head of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the city of Moscow, Anatoly Tikhomirov, owned an apartment of 74 square meters. m, and his wife owns a land plot of 2 thousand square meters. m. In 2013, according to the declaration, he received a payment for housing in the amount of 29.7 million rubles.

The deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service for Moscow, Vladimir Zaets, indicated in his income information for 2012 that he had an apartment of 76 square meters in use. m and a land plot of 500 sq. m. In 2013, he also received a payment in the amount of 28.7 million rubles.

Esipov, Bykov, Zayets and Tikhomirov stood, like everyone else, in line to receive a subsidy; they submitted documents on time and therefore received the money, says Oleg Korshunov. - All meetings of our housing commission were videotaped and broadcast on the FSIN website, so everything is transparent. We refuse subsidies, as a rule, in two cases: if over the last 5 years there has been a deliberate deterioration in housing conditions - but this is a general rule in accordance with the Housing Code, and if the documents are incorrectly executed.

In total, according to Korshunov, 16 thousand families of FSIN employees are registered as needy. Of these, 5.5 thousand are families of active employees, 6.5 thousand are families of veterans and about 4 thousand are families of civil servants working in the prison department.

In addition to housing subsidies, we also issue housing certificates,” explains Korshunov. - Last year, 3,740 families received them for 7.5 billion rubles. This year, almost 5 thousand families will receive them - almost 9 billion rubles. Among the law enforcement agencies, we provide our employees with housing the most.

However, not all FSIN employees agree with General Korshunov. Major Natalya Voshchinina, head of a detachment from St. Petersburg colony No. 6, filed a lawsuit against the regional Federal Penitentiary Service for unlawfully excluding her from the housing queue.

I have given my whole life to law enforcement agencies, and in principle I have nothing to lose,” Natalya jokes bitterly. “I’ve already lost everything: my family, my child, and I still haven’t been able to earn money for my corner.” There are only certificates for impeccable service.

Voshchinina began her service in 1994 in Karelia in the criminal investigation department.

“Apartment luck smiled on us only once,” says Natalya. - My husband and I were given a warrant for a service apartment. But we didn’t have time to live in it. Our daughter was born, she turned out to be very sick.

According to Voshchinina, qualified assistance to her child could only be provided in St. Petersburg. And while she and her husband were rushing around hospitals, trying to save the child, they were deprived of housing.

We arrived, and there were new tenants, and our things were already lying on the street,” recalls Natalya. - In general, we stood in front of the door with the sick child and went back to St. Petersburg. They rented an apartment there, I went to work at the Federal Penitentiary Service, and my husband went back to the police.

After several years of ordeal in rented apartments with a sick daughter who constantly needed medical attention, Voshchinina’s husband could not stand it and left. Natalya was left alone with a sick child in her arms. But she didn't give up.

She worked like an ox. I tried, I thought they would notice. She published scientific works in specialized journals and won competitions for squad leaders. She received a diploma from Stockholm University in the course “Social work with juvenile offenders” and all this time she stood in line for an apartment,” she sighs. “I was hoping to save my girl and live with her in my own house.

Natalya's girl died when she was 8 years old. And she herself was thrown off the waiting list.

I should have already received a warrant,” she says. - But the department was headed by a new general and brought his team. And they all immediately received apartments, but I found myself off the list.

In November last year, the Frunzensky District Court of St. Petersburg decided to reinstate Voshchinina on the waiting list, but the city court upheld it. After being reinstated in the queue, Voshchinina submitted documents to receive a lump sum payment for the purchase of residential premises. The documents were sent to Moscow eight months ago, but they still have not been reviewed, although they were required to do so within three months.

Lieutenant Colonel Anatoly Cherny, who had served for 27 years, was fired while he was in the hospital, and the entire department knew about it very well. He appealed all illegal decisions and has already won five cases. In addition, Cherny is entitled to an apartment.

Now there are two queues at the FSIN,” says Cherny. - One is for housing, the second is for receiving a free one-time subsidy payment.

But it is impossible to understand whether you will receive a payment or not, says Cherny. First, the documents are reviewed by a regional commission, after which they are sent to Moscow. According to the order of the director of the Federal Penitentiary Service, the period for reviewing documents by the Moscow commission should not exceed three months. But in reality, the papers sit for 8–9 months.

No one knows whether you were approved for payment or not. Moreover, all this leapfrog is happening against the backdrop of massive layoffs in the Federal Penitentiary Service,” says Cherny. - And if you are fired, then the subsidy according to the law is no longer provided. That's why all the officers who have been retired are now on edge. After all, you might not even wait for an apartment.

According to the lieutenant colonel, there is a rumor among FSIN employees that the consideration of documents is being deliberately delayed. After all, workers can be managed and laid off during the time that they are being harassed by the commission, and this money can be saved.

However, collecting all the necessary documents is also not easy.

If before this you served in another territorial department, then you need to bring certificates from there that you don’t have any housing there,” he says. - God forbid there be some room that one of the spouses inherited from relatives. The subsidy will no longer be provided. But even if there is nothing. You need to go for all the information. And this also means time and money.

In 2012, several officers from the capital’s pre-trial detention center No. 3, who had worked for more than 10 years in the Federal Penitentiary Service and who had been laid off and thrown out of the departmental dormitory, came to us at once. Against this background, payments of $0.5 million for the purchase of luxury apartments look wild and absurd. Yes, generals must earn honestly and earn a lot, but everything has a limit,” Osechkin is outraged. - The gap between the position of ordinary employees and generals is fantastic, as well as the latter’s statements about supposedly protecting ordinary employees, which, against the backdrop of real cases, look hypocritical and insincere.

Deputy Anton Ishchenko believes that multimillion-dollar payments to generals are extremely defiant behavior towards disenfranchised and unprovided ordinary employees of the department.

If we are fighting corruption, then Accounts Chamber, and the relevant unit of the presidential administration should carefully investigate these facts and take the necessary measures, says Ishchenko.

Oleg Korshunov Photo: FSIN press service

First Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Anatoly Rudy, speaking as a witness for the defense in the criminal case of the former deputy director of the penitentiary system Oleg Korshunov, accused of embezzlement, said that thanks to the defendant, many financial problems in the department were resolved, and provocations were committed more than once against the leaders of the service itself.

Talk about lies and provocations

Anatoly Rudy came to the Gagarinsky District Court as acting director of the Federal Penitentiary Service - head of the department Gennady Kornienko is on vacation.

The witness said that Oleg Korshunov came to the FSIN from business, and, according to him, then everyone was surprised: why would a wealthy man, who even has his own yacht, work in the penitentiary system? However, according to him, soon after his appointment, Korshunov quickly became accustomed to the system, focusing on solving its various financial problems. The first deputy director of the FSIN especially emphasized that Korshunov managed to push through the allocation of subsidies to FSIN employees, for which many are still grateful to him.

Rudy said that the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Production and Industrial House of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia” (PPD), whose ex-head Vitaly Morusov is also in the dock, was not created on Korshunov’s initiative, as the investigation and the state prosecution believe. The former deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service did not promote the project related to the location of shoe production in the colonies. He noted that another former deputy director was responsible for production - Oleg Simchenkov, who acted as a witness for the prosecution in court. Anatoly Rudy himself was against such productions, but the council of experts, and then the board of the Federal Penitentiary Service, supported the production of shoes by prisoners for prisoners and department employees. Production was carried out using equipment and raw materials provided by the general director of DACE Group Trade and Industrial Company LLC (TPK) Smbat Harutyunyan, who testified against Korshunov and was convicted of theft in a special manner.

Anatoly Rudy confirmed Mr. Korshunov’s version that questions arose to Harutyunyan, saying that in response he spread rumors about kickbacks of a certain percentage to the former deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service. " I recommended that Korshunov talk about this with Harutyunyan in the presence of other employees, which he did“- said the witness, noting that the former partner of the FSIN did not publicly support his version, citing the fact that he himself was slandered in order to quarrel with the leadership of the department.

According to the Investigative Committee of Russia (ICR), in 2015, the then deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Oleg Korshunov, the head of the PPD Vitaly Morusov and businessman Smbat Harutyunyan, for selfish reasons, entered into a criminal conspiracy to steal budget funds. For this purpose, in colonies located in the Perm and Krasnoyarsk territories, as well as Lipetsk, the production of shoes for prisoners and prison department employees was organized using TPK equipment and from its materials. According to the documents, the release was carried out by the PPD, from which, on behalf of Mr. Korshunov, the territorial divisions of the FSIN were supposed to purchase shoes. FSUE, within the framework of government contracts concluded with it, received 263 million 278 thousand 421 rubles, subsequently transferring most of the funds to the accounts of DACE Group, Promtorgobuv LLC and Multishveygroup, controlled by Harutyunyan. Having received data that instead of leather, a cheaper material was used in production - split leather, the FSB and the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee decided that.

Meanwhile, the defense of the defendants notes, during the trial no evidence was presented that prisoners and employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service received low-quality shoes, and the thefts themselves were committed. FSIN employees and documents from the prison department confirm that all the shoes were received and almost all of them have already been used for their intended purpose. Lawyers believe that there is no corpus delicti in the case.

Anatoly Rudy said that he himself does not believe in the guilt of his former colleague, and the opposite must be established by the investigative authorities and the court. And at the same time he recalled that earlier, for example, the former director of the FSIN cannery spoke about facts of corruption in the leadership of the FSIN, including Korshunov, the Investigative Committee and the FSB Pavel Belikov, convicted of embezzlement for eight and a half years. As it later turned out, he gave this testimony under pressure, and it turned out to be false, writes Kommersant.

Hello, friends! The topic of corruption does not lose its relevance, so we consider it necessary to return to it and devote this article to the situation in Russia. Probably, many have heard the latest news about the corruption scandal in the Federal Inspectorate for the Execution of Punishments and the detention of Deputy Director Oleg Korshunov.

This is not the first scandal related to the activities of the department. To what extent has corruption taken hold of the Federal Penitentiary Service, and what violations are its employees accused of? Let's try to figure it out.

Why was the deputy detained?

The detention of Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Oleg Korshunov in September of this year came as a bolt from the blue for some, but for others it was a completely natural and expected event. A little earlier, the head of the department, Gennady Kornienko, approached the Ministry of Justice with a seemingly unusual request - to relieve a subordinate from his position.

Obviously, there were reasons for this; today the deputy is charged with embezzlement on an especially large scale, and he did this using his official position.

The main complaints of law enforcement agencies are the activities of the deputy in the construction of a pre-trial detention center in St. Petersburg, the so-called “Krestov-2”. It was supposed to be completed in 2013; considerable funds were allocated for construction.

However, even today, in 2017, there is no need to talk about the end of the protracted process. During this time, according to information announced in the press, the cost of the facility has tripled and amounts to a colossal amount of 12 billion rubles. And this is not the limit - additional funds are needed.

It is assumed that it is directly related to the theft of money during the construction of Korshunov. It is impossible to carry out such things alone - the head of one of the departments of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Vitaly Durnev, has already been dismissed for the construction of Krestov-2. The structure he heads is in charge of construction and repair issues.

He checked the progress of the work and is directly related to the long-term construction. Oleg Korshunov supervised the activities of the department.

The latter, by the way, in addition to embezzlement of money in connection with the construction of Krestov-2, is accused of inflating contracts for fuels and lubricants. In total, the damage caused to the Federal Penitentiary Service by the deputy is estimated at 160 million rubles.

Where is the watch collection and yacht from?

The fact that Korshunov is not a poor person is confirmed by the search conducted and the valuables seized. These include a collection of gift watches, large sums of money, and an expensive yacht, which is modestly referred to as a “boat” in income statements.

And it is likely that the now former deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service turned out to be dishonest not only during the construction of Krestov-2. At the beginning of this year, the case against Pavel Belikov became widely known. This “businessman” and former Saratov official headed the federal state unitary enterprise “FSIN Cannery”.

He implemented the government contract in such a way that the budget did not receive about one and a half billion rubles.

The former director transferred funds allocated by the state for the production of canned food and fermented milk products to the accounts of persons under his control. And Oleg Korshunov directly supervised the supply of food to prisons.

He created a structure that had a virtual monopoly on the supply of products to the colonies. At the same time, as has become a tradition in the Federal Penitentiary Service, prices for it were significantly inflated.

The director of the cannery entered into a pre-trial deal with the investigation and, as numerous media reports. He named a number of FSIN employees to whom he gave bribes. According to some information, Korshunov was among these persons.

However, at that time, no charges were brought against him. According to some, this is the result of high-ranking patronage. But, as they say, no matter how much the rope twists, the end is the same. Today Oleg Korshunov was detained by the Basmanny Court for two months.

High-profile cases of very recent times

Corruption scandals in the Federal Penitentiary Service are associated not only with the name of Korshunov. The Penitentiary Inspectorate became mired in them much earlier. In June of this year, former head of the Federal Penitentiary Service Alexander Reimer was convicted of purchasing electronic bracelets.

The official will take a break from work for 8 years. For what? For damage to the state, which is estimated at 3 billion rubles. As proven by the court, the bracelets were bought at inflated prices and, interestingly, they were not subsequently used.

The head of the Rostov Federal Penitentiary Service Sergei Smirnov and his deputy Sergei Ralnikov are also suspected of receiving a bribe. They were detained in July this year.


Today, human rights activists of the Gulagu.net project are sounding the alarm on another issue. The founder of the project, Vladimir Osechkin, sent an appeal to the Ministry of Justice, the Prosecutor General and the Investigative Committee that another deputy of the FSIN, Anatoly Rudy, was involved in corruption.

According to the information provided, under his leadership a deal was carried out with the Logic Business company, which was obviously impossible to implement either in terms of timing or volume. The transaction size is more than 90 million rubles. By the way, one of the measures taken after this appeal by Rudoy was an attempt to block the Internet resource.

All these facts are evidence that the agency designed to monitor compliance with the law is mired in corruption. The detention and conviction of the leaders indicates the unwillingness of the Russian government to put up with this situation. Many believe that changes are coming in the security forces, in particular in the Federal Penitentiary Service.

In the meantime, Oleg Korshunov’s case continues. The latest news is that the court has revised the date for consideration of the appeal to November 1. We are talking about changing the preventive measure. Let us remind you that he was arrested until November 13, 2017.

Do you think that changes are long overdue in the FSIN and that the agency is one of the most corrupt? Or you have your own point of view on current events. How bad is corruption in Russia in general, in your opinion?

We would be interested to hear your opinion. You can express it and leave comments on our website.